"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The licensing terms seems ok to me, so I wanted to see if the community was > ok about it (apparently not).
I didn't see their licensing terms.... > So even if this installer is provided in addition to other OSS based > installers, it's not ok ? Since when is this project refusing contributions > from companies, BTW ? There's no explicit endorsement required, and no > blinking ZeroG ad we'll have to put anywhere. They'll also provide the > installer script. We're "endorsing" a commercial product when distributing an installer such as Zero-G with our code... > Note: Did you notice what the httpd project was using for its installers > (http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/apache_2.0.35-win32-x86-no_ > ssl.msi) ? Doesn't seem OSS to me ... Not OSS, but directly derived from an Operating System... MSI (MicroSoft Installer) is embedded into each copy of Window$, they just "leverage" a capability already present in the platform... Pier -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
