> Thanks for the comments Kin-Man. Given those comments and a look at the jasper2 > code I have come up with the patch below. After profiling jasper2 I saw that > there was indeed a speed improvement over Jasper. However the excessive creation > of File objects and getting files from URL's was still a problem. > I did as you suggested and used the JspServletWrapper object to hold all of the > required data. As well I set up this version to fall back to reading JSP's from > a URL if reading the File object doesn't work. > I found in my testing that the jasper engine used ~15% of the request time in > loadJSP, jasper2 used ~12%, and my change uses ~1%. The only thing my code does > not do is force a reload of the .class file if it is deleted. My code only > causes a recompile if the jsp changes. I can look into modifying it to handle > this situation as well if required. I look forward to your feedback.
I don't agree with those numbers. Accoding to my testing it is far less significant. I got some very significant increase in the throughtput numbers to confirm that (using index.jsp). Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
