You're right. It should have been "-r TOMCAT_4_1_2" (which checks out fine
for me).

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: SSI Servlet has big problems


> Hi Bill.
>
> Didn't have any luck with that either (see below).  Does it work for
> you? Any idea what the message about the CVS locks means / how to fix it?
>
> Yeah, I see what you mean re: files in the attic.  I'm curious how
> things looked before I started changing things, to better understand
> what caused this code collision...
>
> -Dan
>
> Here's what I got when I tried to do the -r thing:
>
> [dan@oogie tmp]$ echo $CVSROOT
> :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvs
>
> [dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs co -r tomcat_4_1_2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0
> Protocol error: uncounted data discarded
>
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> >"-r tomcat_4_1_2" should work.  You could also "add" the files back from
the
> >Attic, since it's a completely different directory.
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Dan Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:25 PM
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: SSI Servlet has big problems
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>I'm trying to checkout an old version of tomcat with the following
> >>
> >>
> >command:
> >
> >
> >>[dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs co -D "4 months ago" jakarta-tomcat-4.0
> >>
> >>And I'm getting the following error:
> >>
> >>Core dumped; preserving /tmp/cvs-serv41751 on server.
> >>CVS locks may need cleaning up.
> >>
> >>My version is (on Linux):
> >>
> >> >[dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs --version
> >> >
> >> >Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.1p1 (client/server)
> >>
> >>I tried the same thing on Solaris, and had the same problem.
> >>
> >>Any idea?  Am I doing something stupid?
> >>
> >>-Dan
> >>
> >>Dan Sandberg wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Yes, let's merge them together.  How do I get to the code that you
> >>>fixed?  Were the test cases in CVS?
> >>>
> >>>I'd say lets get all the test cases setup, and see where my code fails
> >>>your tests.  Then we can use your code wherever functionality is
> >>>
> >>>
> >missing.
> >
> >
> >>>I thought I had checked out the head revision.  Did I make a mistake
> >>>with the cvs check out command?
> >>>
> >>>-Dan
> >>>
> >>>Paul Speed wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>(Resending from my older address in hopes that it will help avoid
> >>>>some confusion.)
> >>>>
> >>>>Hmmm...
> >>>>
> >>>>This is what I get for ignoring the list for a while. ;)
> >>>>
> >>>>Note: I completely rewrote the SSI support in 4.x HEAD and had Bip
> >>>>apply the patches (Amy also did some patching) for exactly the same
> >>>>reasons you originally mention.  I did this around Oct/Nov 2001.  On
> >>>>most of the 4.0 bug reports for SSI (which I agree was a bad
> >>>>implementation on that branch) I commented that my changes should
> >>>>probably have been back-ported from head.
> >>>>
> >>>>I even had test cases for all of the SSI commands, including the
> >>>>conditionals which I added support for.
> >>>>
> >>>>My only guess is that you were looking at an older version when
finding
> >>>>the problem.  My rewrite solved all of these problems and was
> >>>>completely compatible with all mod_include commands except for the
> >>>>regex stuff.
> >>>>
> >>>>Of course, now it seems that my version has been completely blown
> >>>>away.  Which is unfortunate since that means we lose conditionals...
> >>>>and possibly some of the more esoteric nesting behavior that I copied
> >>>>from Apache (I haven't tested this yet.)
> >>>>
> >>>>It's too bad that SSI on head was blown away for changes to an older
> >>>>version.  Any chance we can nicely merge the two good versions into
> >>>>one more good version?
> >>>>
> >>>>-Paul Speed
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>
> >>
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>
> >>
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to