I'm trying to checkout an old version of tomcat with the following command:
[dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs co -D "4 months ago" jakarta-tomcat-4.0 And I'm getting the following error: Core dumped; preserving /tmp/cvs-serv41751 on server. CVS locks may need cleaning up. My version is (on Linux): >[dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs --version > >Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.1p1 (client/server) I tried the same thing on Solaris, and had the same problem. Any idea? Am I doing something stupid? -Dan Dan Sandberg wrote: > Yes, let's merge them together. How do I get to the code that you > fixed? Were the test cases in CVS? > > I'd say lets get all the test cases setup, and see where my code fails > your tests. Then we can use your code wherever functionality is missing. > > I thought I had checked out the head revision. Did I make a mistake > with the cvs check out command? > > -Dan > > Paul Speed wrote: > >> (Resending from my older address in hopes that it will help avoid >> some confusion.) >> >> Hmmm... >> >> This is what I get for ignoring the list for a while. ;) >> >> Note: I completely rewrote the SSI support in 4.x HEAD and had Bip >> apply the patches (Amy also did some patching) for exactly the same >> reasons you originally mention. I did this around Oct/Nov 2001. On >> most of the 4.0 bug reports for SSI (which I agree was a bad >> implementation on that branch) I commented that my changes should >> probably have been back-ported from head. >> >> I even had test cases for all of the SSI commands, including the >> conditionals which I added support for. >> >> My only guess is that you were looking at an older version when finding >> the problem. My rewrite solved all of these problems and was >> completely compatible with all mod_include commands except for the >> regex stuff. >> >> Of course, now it seems that my version has been completely blown >> away. Which is unfortunate since that means we lose conditionals... >> and possibly some of the more esoteric nesting behavior that I copied >> from Apache (I haven't tested this yet.) >> >> It's too bad that SSI on head was blown away for changes to an older >> version. Any chance we can nicely merge the two good versions into >> one more good version? >> >> -Paul Speed > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>