Henri Gomez wrote: > Why did you include JK2 docs into Tomcat 4.1.11 ? Because people who download Tomcat usually want to configure JK also, without going online again after downloading the binaries.
> I think it's better to have them on jakarta site (will have to > create a jakarta-tomcat-connector/jk and jk2 from main pages). No, it's a bad idea. Experience has shown that people see JK + Tomcat as being one product, although we may develop it separately. They also have no idea where to look for documentation, and I don't want to link back to the web. So I'd like to include the whole doc bundle with the Tomcat download (and have some connector binaries also). > I agree you should include the java side of JK2 but not the > native one. > > Don't forget that many users will use jk instead of jk2 since > it's their current setup and may be desoriented by seing ref > to jk2 in TC4... JK the Java code is dead (deprecated, and unsupported). JK 2 the Java code is the current code. mod_jk OTOH is the current code, and mod_jk2 is experimental. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
