Remy Maucherat wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > >> Why did you include JK2 docs into Tomcat 4.1.11 ? > > > Because people who download Tomcat usually want to configure JK also, > without going online again after downloading the binaries. > >> I think it's better to have them on jakarta site (will have to >> create a jakarta-tomcat-connector/jk and jk2 from main pages). > > > No, it's a bad idea. Experience has shown that people see JK + Tomcat as > being one product, although we may develop it separately. They also have > no idea where to look for documentation, and I don't want to link back > to the web. > > So I'd like to include the whole doc bundle with the Tomcat download > (and have some connector binaries also). > >> I agree you should include the java side of JK2 but not the >> native one. >> >> Don't forget that many users will use jk instead of jk2 since >> it's their current setup and may be desoriented by seing ref >> to jk2 in TC4... > > > JK the Java code is dead (deprecated, and unsupported). JK 2 the Java > code is the current code. > mod_jk OTOH is the current code, and mod_jk2 is experimental.
When I said JK, I was thinking jk 1.2.0 (native). So what to do with jk 1.2.0 doc ? JF and I worked on it for at least 2 weeks, since doc allways was a leak in connector are. Do you plan to included also jk 1.2.0 doc or make reference to it ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
