No, they don' t. The socket code is now reverted to the 4.1.12 tag. It needs lot of work to make the entire logic work as It should (well, that's my opinion), not just bug-fixing. The concept is wrong, not the code.
Either we'll retag that as 2_0_0 or 2_0_1. What do you think? I would like to make that as JK2_2_0_1, and rerelease, as 2.0.1 MT. > -----Original Message----- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 10:18 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_channel_socket.c > > > Did you source tarball include latest patches from Nacho ? > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
