> Either we'll retag that as 2_0_0 or 2_0_1. > What do you think?
2_0_0_rel, as I did for JK 1.2.0 > > I would like to make that as JK2_2_0_1, and rerelease, as 2.0.1 It's just a fix, so make a new tarball and tell you get it from 2_0_0_rel (unless you put an announce to tomcat-user which in that case make greated audience and the 2.0.1 is really required) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
