Mladen Turk wrote: > There has been some major fixes inside the uriMap, uriEnv, apr_socket > and lb that makes the 2_0_0 IMO unusable, and personally I'm ashamed as > a RM that this was a release after all :(.
Do not! That is a lot of work to make a release and all of us will benefit to the fact you are now fitted to be the next RM :-)) > > Since we tagged and released JK2 as beta, seems to me that we could > easily do the same for the 2.0.1, and just pretend that 2.0.0 ewer > existed :) > > The question is are we going to wait for a Apache1.3/APR/JNI builds or > just go without that. But before going to the 2_0_1 (What doesn't kill > you makes you stronger ;) could you guys do the testing against current > CVS for all the discussed items. Do not hurry too much if you think that 2_0_0 is a very bad we should not loose time producing binaries for it. But we must make sure 2_0_1 will be good enough for beta. > > MT. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
