Mladen Turk wrote:
> There has been some major fixes inside the uriMap, uriEnv, apr_socket
> and lb that makes the 2_0_0 IMO unusable, and personally I'm ashamed as
> a RM that this was a release after all :(.
> 
> Since we tagged and released JK2 as beta, seems to me that we could
> easily do the same for the 2.0.1, and just pretend that 2.0.0 ewer
> existed :)

As JF said, we should wait a little more before releasing a 2.0.1
(even beta).

> The question is are we going to wait for a Apache1.3/APR/JNI builds or
> just go without that. But before going to the 2_0_1 (What doesn't kill
> you makes you stronger ;) could you guys do the testing against current
> CVS for all the discussed items.

I think Apache 1.3 / APR / JNI should be resolved before 2.0.1


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to