Keith Wannamaker wrote:
I don't understand those numbers. Even the two above (how can there be twice the bandwidth with only 20% more requests if the bench is correct ?).Same box, same app, same test, with Tomcat 4.0.6's http10 and 11 adaptor:coyote/http11 37rq/sec, 406kb/sec http10 30rq/sec, 181kb/sec I've always held that 3.3 was more "lean and mean" than 4.0 but now I'm wondering if this is just indicating some basic architectural differences.
I thought 3.3 + Coyote HTTP/1.1 was as fast as the default HTTP/1.0.
Remy
Keith | -----Original Message----- | Subject: Coyote/Http11 under load | | | I'm using http11 on a busy site with more or less Tomcat 3.3 head | (3.3.2-dev). | | coyote/http11 4.2rq/sec, 63kb/sec | http10 6.3rq/sec, 92kb/sec -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>