Steven, I normally do care of the IIS connector, sorry for not being quick but as everyone i'm overloaded, your change althought optional is big and until yesterday i did not reviewed it, and i'll plan to apply it asap.. If someone can take it and apply, ok from me, but as everybody here apply something without at least compiling and testing it makes me very nervous, and i suppouse other committers feel the same..
> > ... about the IIS connector? Every post that I have made > with respect to it > has been more or less ignored over the last couple of weeks. > First when I > reported the problem and asked for advice on how I might implement a > solution. Then when I implemented a solution without advice > and posted the > patch, and most recently when I asked about the suitability > and status of my > patch. > Nothing cares about your problems mainly because they are you problems, you are the most interested in them, sooo :).. the real reason is that the IIS connector in his old jk1 version is only touched by a small subset of committers, me in between them, and we all are very very busy atm, sorry.., but that's life.. > What do I have to do to get some support? I'm willing to follow any > protocol that is required... I would just appreciate not > having to apply my > patch every time I upgrade the connector to the latest > official version. > Steven, the jk1 IIS connector it's freezed from many many time ago.. so it cannot be that hard to follow the development.. ;) and you have learned the protocol very well, maybe a bug with the patch as an attachment could do the trick.... ;).. Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
