Ignacio, Thanks for the reply. I'm sorry that my e-mail sounded a bit edgy, but I felt it had to be that way to get some info back. I know that people can get busy at times (I did not know the state of your personal work load at the moment) so take your time. I was mostly concerned about not getting any info about where the review process was, but you have now answered that question, and I thank you.
As far as JK1 vs. JK2 goes, is the JK2 connector ready? I seem to remember reading some docs in the source tree generally stating that since the jk2 stuff is not as seasoned as the jk1 stuff, an upgrade is not recommended for production systems.... so I am sticking with jk1. What is/will be the benefit of switching? Whenever it is felt that the connector is ready for mass use, I will be upgrading. I will also be willing to merge my changes in to jk2. Do you think it's better to do this sooner or later? With respect to your last comment: Is submitting patches as incidents in bugzilla preferred to posting them on the mailing list? If so, I will do this in the future. Thank you very much. ---------------------------- .-. | Steven Velez oo| | Software Engineer /`'\ | alventive (\_;/) | 678-202-2226 -----Original Message----- From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 4:29 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: RE: Does anyone care.... Steven, I normally do care of the IIS connector, sorry for not being quick but as everyone i'm overloaded, your change althought optional is big and until yesterday i did not reviewed it, and i'll plan to apply it asap.. If someone can take it and apply, ok from me, but as everybody here apply something without at least compiling and testing it makes me very nervous, and i suppouse other committers feel the same.. > > ... about the IIS connector? Every post that I have made > with respect to it > has been more or less ignored over the last couple of weeks. > First when I > reported the problem and asked for advice on how I might implement a > solution. Then when I implemented a solution without advice > and posted the > patch, and most recently when I asked about the suitability > and status of my > patch. > Nothing cares about your problems mainly because they are you problems, you are the most interested in them, sooo :).. the real reason is that the IIS connector in his old jk1 version is only touched by a small subset of committers, me in between them, and we all are very very busy atm, sorry.., but that's life.. > What do I have to do to get some support? I'm willing to follow any > protocol that is required... I would just appreciate not > having to apply my > patch every time I upgrade the connector to the latest > official version. > Steven, the jk1 IIS connector it's freezed from many many time ago.. so it cannot be that hard to follow the development.. ;) and you have learned the protocol very well, maybe a bug with the patch as an attachment could do the trick.... ;).. Saludos, Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
