Henri Gomez wrote: > Hi to all, > > Now that jk seems stabilized a bit, should we focalize on jk2 ? > > For instance I added some features to jk (ping/pong) which should be > ported to jk2. > > Also I wonder if APR is mandatory for jk2. > > I'd like to use APR as a facade to all Operating System calls. > > The goal is to hide all the complexity of Windows, iSeries, > differents Unix implementations behind APR which is now stable > and well diffused. > > As such it will be +1 to make APR mandatory and start modifying jk2, to > make it use only APR call.
+1 APR is released and stable - no reason not to do that. Costin > > But I'd like to have your opinion first. > > > PS: For those of you who was here 2 or 3 years ago, the requirement > of APR for mod_webapp got my total -1 at this time since it > wasn't really available, but today that's completly different. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
