Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x.
Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll).
So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache 1.3.x support in future JK 1.2.x or should we start a 'new' APR JK 1.2.x based implementation ?
Why use APR in mod_jk ?
Support for Apache1.3 is IMO more important than support for IIS. And so far, mod_jk seems to work without any apr - and it is in maintainance mode, so no major changes should be made.
I think good Apache 1.3 support is more important than improving IIS support. IIS is not gaining market share these days, and it seems quite obvious most of the new IIS 6 installations are going to be used to run .not web components.
Rémy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
