At 01:56 PM 1/13/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>org.apache.apr... ??? >>If this is private, and you've suggested it should be, don't you mean >>org.apache.jakarta.apr... ? > >He he :) > >I didn't said it should be private to J-T-C nor Jakarta. >But the fact is that we don't have OO languages infrastructure >for APR glue code. Seems to me that we'll need to go through >incubation to create self standing apr-java project, or >something like apr-oo/java.
Self standing? If apr is borked (and the oo-dev'ers prove it) do you want another layer in the middle? This probably should be closely paired to apr to ensure communications and direction. Having them both under the same pmc ensures that the apr project doesn't go off on some weird tangent that interferes with oo implementations (not that I expect this would happen.) >If you think we can make something like that in a reasonable >amount of time, count me in. Happy to encourage it and I'll present it (with myself as a list moderator) to the apr project, and invite our modperl friends along with John Sterling and others who have created C++ wrappers. >In other case I can rename the package to whatever name desired >if it breaks some policy or something like. This sort of surprises me coming from an ASF java developer. I seriously doubt this team would find it amusing to discover org.apache.catalina namespaces populating an xml project's code. -1 on appropriating another ASF project's namespace (the same -1 I should have offered to forking proxy.) +/-0 if you want to build on org.apache.jk.apr namespace. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
