Hi, > I don't see mod_jk ending up the same as mod_jk2 in that: > 1) The configuration is relatively sane as compared to that of mod_jk2 > 2) There are many reasonably stable mod_jk versions, so even *if* > Mladen screws up a release there are plenty of alternative mod_jk > versions. unfortunately the situation on NetWare platform is a bit other, just to make that clear to everyone: although APR is fully functional on NetWare it can only be consumed by Apache 2.x and never from Apache 1.3.x - hence if APR gets mandatory for mod_jk then NetWare Apache 1.3 gets broken (and perhaps not only NetWare) for ever. The same applies to SHM.
> It would be great if everyone could move to mod_proxy_ajp, but I believe > that still requires Apache 2.1/2.2 -- which means it has not yet arrived > for the majority of us. it would be of interest if we can now already compile the module with the 2.0.x series; then I would love to provide binaries for NetWare and Win32 on my site, and we will see what the users think... > I personally applaud Mladen for his efforts to fix/improve/maintain > mod_jk given that that is the reality for most of us. the same from my side - and to make that absolutely clear: that was nothing against Mladen's work, but more a curious question why directions changed, and a prognose what this will probably cause for NetWare. Guenter. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
