For practical purposes, I don't think you'll gain much using plugins for <c:set> and <c:out>, since they are relatively simple, and the overheads for invoking the corresponding tag handlers is relatively minor. You'll probably achieve most benefit if you can provide plugins for them that only handle tags with no or empty bodies.
If you must, just for academic discussion, you can get to the body content of a tag by generating codes to invoke pushBody() when you enter the body, and popBody() when you leave. - Kin-man On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 21:07, wing lee wrote: > Thanks a lot at first :-) > > By now I think on two occasions the body content should be used. Firstly in > the out tag, because some special characters should be converted, so if body > content is output, the body content should be filtered. Secondly in the set > tag, if the body content is assigned to the variable, the body content should > be got at first. > > That's why I think there should be a method to get the body content. > > Now in the out tag, I just output the body content without filter. In the set > tag, when I have to use the body content, I invoke the method > dontUseTagPlugin. I don't know whether doing so is ok. > > Best regards, > Li Jing > > > > > > --------------------------------- > DO YOU YAHOO!? > 雅虎免费G邮箱－中国第一绝无垃圾邮件骚扰超大邮箱 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
