On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:14:03PM -0400, Moran Ben-David wrote: : : Thanks for the warning.. I'm using JK2 on the assumption that JK2 would be : better and didn't want to be left behind.
Sort-of yes, sort-of no: JK is newer, and it's certainly going to get more development attention for the time being... just like Tomcat5. For the archives, and in the hopes that I alleviate some frustrations: A lot of people out there seem to think Apache2 and/or Tomcat5 requires JK2. That's NOT the case. I run Apache2 + jk + Tomcat5 and it's been fine. -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
