OK, talking to myself as it seems ;) Accept my apologies if no one is interested, but bringing this even further wouldn't it be an option to have the servlet seperated from Tomcat and letting it implement against an API a little bit richter then directory context? Maybe in commons? Such an API could accept settings of properties and even locking.
Compared to Slide I really like the servlet as it is pretty obvious and lean in code. I am pretty sure quite some people would be interested in such a solution and would contribute to its compliance to the spec and compatibility to diverse clients. Would that be an option? Oliver On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:10:56 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looking into this further, couldn't proppatch be implemented properly? > I know the file dir context does not support setting of attributes, > but there are other dir contexts imaginable that do, right? > > Oliver > > > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:23:49 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks, > > > > I am just reviewing Tomcat's WebDAV servlet and have even run Slide's > > WebDAV testsuite against it - many tests work :) I really like the > > brevity! > > > > I understand the default context used is FileDirContext, right? I am > > no Tomcat expert, so maybe this is a stupid question, but is it > > actually possible to use a different context possibly accessing a > > system in a more complicated way? Has anybody tried this already? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Oliver > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
