Mark, Remy, thanks for your attention. Did not want to complain about missing responses, I was just honestly wondering if anyone was interested. Obviously, someone is :)
I understand you are not interested in making this servlet available to a broader scope of people, are you? If so I would completely understand that as I have learned about the drawbacks of too general solutions. Oliver On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:18:48 +0100, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:47:48 -0000, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Not quite talking to yourself but what with timezones and day jobs and all > > that > > it isn't always possible to reply quickly. ;) > > > > I am not sure of the level of interest in this but people have taken the > > trouble > > to write bug reports and it does crop up reasonably often on the lists > > considering its size. > > > > If you want to enhance the webdav servet I would be happy to look at your > > patches and apply them as appropriate. There is however, one caveat. I don't > > want the webdav servlet to become a source of bloat so it is important that > > it > > remains lean - ideally in a single servlet. > > I like it a lot better as a simple servlet, actually ;) > > About the no-propatch: the idea is that the filesystem support for > this would require some extra complexity, which I ruled out. Since > most people would use the filesystem, the feature becomes sort of > bloat. > > -- > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Rémy Maucherat > Developer & Consultant > JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
