hope this is not a thread hijack ..

in terms of IIS, will the isapi_redirect.dll be recommended for use rather than 
the JK2 isapi_redirector2.dll?

cheers, Allistair.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillip Qin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 November 2004 16:52
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: What Connector Should I Use?
> 
> 
> Will you suggest that we can now start switching jk2 to 
> either mod_proxy or
> mod_jk? I really hate jk because it is difficult to configure 
> (am I the
> first one to say that?) compared to jk2. I am kinda guy that 
> would like to
> deal with the enemy I know, in this case - jk2.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: November 29, 2004 11:39 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: What Connector Should I Use?
> 
> 
> Phillip Qin wrote:
> > I think the "other reason" cited in the news does not apply 
> to me. I 
> > use jk2. I like it because it is easy to configure.
> 
> You are the first one saying that :).
> 
> 
> > Of course, if people already
> > have the jk configure in production, why would they bother 
> upgrading 
> > to jk2 and creating a new learning curve? Look at how many 
> sites still 
> > use Apache 1.3.
> > 
> 
> Also things like pluggable protocol never went trough socket 
> channel, and
> that already works very well in the jk connector.
> 
> Instead of trying to fix all that we decided to move forward 
> and integrate
> ajp protocol directly inside the httpd's core as an 
> extensions to proxy
> module. This new feature will be available out-of-the-box 
> within apache2.2.
> 
> As said in the news section. We'll continue to fully support 
> jk for all
> other web servers, and backport all the good stuff from jk2 
> (probably even
> the unix sockets). A lots of work has already been done in 
> that direction,
> like new load balancer algorithm, socket timeouts, extensive 
> logging, bug
> fixing, etc...
> 
> Regards,
> Mladen Turk.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:41ab50a1133981197880000!
> 


<FONT SIZE=1 FACE="VERDANA,ARIAL" COLOR=BLUE> 
-------------------------------------------------------
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
<a href="http://www.qas.com";>www.qas.com</a>
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
-------------------------------------------------------
</FONT>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to