Sure, it can't hurt to try it out. Even if the specs are different,
the data point is a good baseline comparison. I'll post the test plans
shortly to my apache directory.

peter



On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:28:52 -0500, Sessoms, Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've got 5.5.4 w/jvm 1.5.0-b64 on fc3 (2.6.9-1.667,i386).
> unfortunately, the hardware is a desktop unit 760 MB ram, ide drive, 2.6
> P4 (512 cache).  let me know if i should give it a try.
> 
> Peter Lin wrote:
> 
> >any tomcat user out there have Redhat FC3 installed and want to help
> >run some tests?  I will post the jmeter test plans this weekend.
> >
> >it would make remy really happy :)
> >
> >peter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>And no FC 3 ? ;) I think it would run fine on your computer, and it's
> >>a higher quality distribution overall (it doesn't have the stupid NPTL
> >>backport that FC 1 has). Or you could try Ubuntu (I plan to switch to
> >>that distro when they release hoary).
> >>
> >>Anyway, I'd be interested if you tried stressing a little the thread
> >>pool I added in 5.5 (strategy="ms" threadPriority="7" on the Connector
> >>element) to see if it gives a difference in the error rate (and also
> >>if it's not completely broken). You may want to increase maxThreads as
> >>well for your tests (it's 150 by default, which is dangerously close
> >>of the concurrency used by your client)
> >>
> >>--
> >>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Rémy Maucherat
> >>Developer & Consultant
> >>JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
> >>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to