On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:39 +0100, Mladen Turk wrote: > Michael Stiller wrote: > > > > I tried something i checked out from cvs last friday. > > Use more recent :)
Ok, just running a fresh cvs tree. The problem is *still* there, but it seems that there are fewer sockets hanging around at the moment. > First, two second recycle is far to small. > It should be at least higher then socket_timeout. > I mean, you have 10 second timeout and 2 second recycle !?. > Second no need to cache_timeout on prefork, > since you have only one cached worker (default), > so you don't need cachesize too. Ok fixed that. Config is now: ... worker.proc2111.port=12111 worker.proc2111.lbfactor=1 worker.proc2111.local_worker=1 worker.proc2111.socket_timeout=5 worker.proc2111.recycle_timeout=10 ... Regards, -Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
