Hi Nathan!

A good source that I went to to find your answer is
http://tomcat.mslinn.com/ .  This site has validators for both server.xml
and web.xml.  According to that site, "server.xml is an XML file without a
formal DTD or schema." He goes on to summarize what he has dug up about it.
Check it out!

Jevo


-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Coast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: server.xml / dtd


Hi,

I'm just interested in what should / shouldn't be in the server.xml - I'm 
looking for a complete doc of what can be configured using server.xml - does

such a thing exist?

Cheers
Nathan

Hari Yellina wrote:

> why do you require DTD. To check whether it is a validate documet. it is
,u
> dont have to worry much. One more thing it. If it is a XML file. You dont
> neccesarily require a DTD.
> 
> Regard,
> Yellina
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gerteis, Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 11:10 PM
> Subject: AW: server.xml / dtd
> 
> 
> Nope,
> 
> in the /conf folder, this is the web.dtd for validating web.xml
> configuration files.
> TomCat is not coming with a server.dtd, at least slocate was not finding
> anything ;)
> 
> I'm searching for the server.dtd as well. It's not specified in the Java
> Servlet Standard. So it must be something Tomcat specific.
> 
> regards...
> ...roman.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Hari Yellina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 14:43
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: server.xml / dtd
> 
> 
> it can be found in cofig directory of u r tomcat
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nathan Coast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: tomcat user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:39 PM
> Subject: server.xml / dtd
> 
> 
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> where can I find the dtd of server.xml? - is there such a thing?
>> Is the dtd the best place to find docs on server.xml or is there a
> 
> complete
> 
>> configuration doc elsewhere?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Nathan
>> 

Reply via email to