Great! Thanks for the link, and cudos to Mike Slinn et.al.
for the good work.
On Sat, 19 May 2001, you wrote:
> FWIW, I think Mike Slinn has put up a web.xml validator (and other
> useful tools/documentation) at
>
> http://tomcat.mslinn.com/
>
>
> On Sat, 19 May 2001, Robert Petersen wrote:
>
> > It matters, and doesn't have to do with SAX vs. DOM, it's because
> > of the DTD - check out this bit of the DTD:
> > <!ELEMENT web-app (icon?, display-name?, description?, distribut-able?,
> > context-param*, filter*, filter-mapping*, listener*, servlet*,
> > servlet-mapping*,
> > session-config?, mime-mapping*, welcome-file-list?, error-page*,
> > taglib*, resource-env-ref*, resource-ref*, security-constraint*,
> > login-config?,
> > security-role*, env-entry*, ejb-ref*, ejb-local-ref*)>
> >
> > This says that the "servlet-mapping" tags must follow all of the "servlet".
> > Basically the
> > tags must be in the order above.
> >
> > - Robert Petersen
> > http://www.orangefood.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Draucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 9:24 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: web.xml layout
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know if it makes any difference whether I group
> > servlet contexts with servlet mappings or keep all contexts
> > together and below them keep all mappings together.
> >
> > Assuming the xml file is being processed by SAX, the
> > callback handling would make this irrelevant I would think.
> >
> > Thoughts?....
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Milt Epstein
> Research Programmer
> Software/Systems Development Group
> Computing and Communications Services Office (CCSO)
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Richard Draucker, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Protected-Data.Com www.protected-data.com
Remote data support for web developers.
