Andrew Cooke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I don't want to use 4.0 as it's beta.
Don't worry about being a beta... It's stable, _VERY_ stable.
Pier
- SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 BERNARDO ANTONIO BUFFA
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Loïc Lefèvre
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Inggs
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Ignacio J. Ortega
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Inggs
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Bryan Rood
- Tomcat 4.0 stability (Was: Re: SAX 2.0, se... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: Tomcat 4 / Apache connecter (Was: ... chris brown
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Craig R. McClanahan
- AW: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Nikolic Branislav
