Pier, I am interested in using a 4.0.something tomcat build. Are there official sources at apache that can confirm the "VERY_stable" declaration that you have made? My company won't let me use anything but a stable production release. Is the 4.0 the same as prod quality? thanks so much, Bryan -----Original Message----- From: Pier P. Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 9:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don't want to use 4.0 as it's beta. Don't worry about being a beta... It's stable, _VERY_ stable. Pier
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 BERNARDO ANTONIO BUFFA
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Loïc Lefèvre
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- Re: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.... Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Inggs
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Ignacio J. Ortega
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Inggs
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Andrew Cooke
- Tomcat 4.0 stability (Was: Re: SAX 2.0, sealin... Bryan Rood
- Tomcat 4.0 stability (Was: Re: SAX 2.0, s... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: Tomcat 4 / Apache connecter (Was:... chris brown
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Craig R. McClanahan
- AW: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Nikolic Branislav
- Beyond Tomcat 4..? chris brown
- Re: Beyond Tomcat 4..? Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Beyond Tomcat 4..? chris brown
- RE: SAX 2.0, sealing, Tomcat 3.2.3 Jess Holle and Wendy Vidlak