Hi Rob,
I didn't do comprehensive tests. Just started tomcat, wait about 20 sec,
and stop tomcat (using the batch files, on Win2K). I didn't test on Linux.
For this 'test' ;-) Sun JDK responds well than IBM JDK.
- Hari.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance
> Again demonstrating that performance is completely dependant upon the OS,
JDK, type of web application, etc. Blanket statements like, "Tomcat is
faster/slower than some other container" are *pretty much* (not completely)
useless nowadays.
>
> How hard is it to install JDKs and test? Change the value of JAVA_HOME,
restart the container, and run your tests again...
>
> - r
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:49:42 +0530 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Which JDK gives best performance for TOMCAT 3.2 on Win2k & Linux? I
heard
> > that IBM jdk will give higher performance but when I run Tomcat using
IBM
> > Jdk I feel it is slower than Sun's (on Windows 2000).
> >
> > Kindly advice me in this regard.
> >
> > - Hari.
> >
> > =====================================
> > Hariharasubramanian.R
> > Developer, iEvents,
> > Kumaran Systems (Betawave Solutions)
> > www.kumaran.com
> > www.betawavesolutions.com
> > Reinforcing Your Business
> > Ph: 0091-44-620 2079, 4967 (Extn: 318/328)
> > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
