I believe it's in the jakarta-tomcat-connectors module.

--jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way


> clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull the
> latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked the
> dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I don't
know
> who...
>
> --jeff
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
>
> > I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
> this.
> >
> > Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
> mod_jk
> > *point*
> > B
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really
need
> > to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> > while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested. AFAIK,
> > there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he was
> taking
> > a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
> where
> > he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already
included
> > in server.xml.
> >
> > Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I
see
> > all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
> >
> > Your call...
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> > small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
> publicfile)
> > to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the dynamic
> > stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
> > images
> > > also!
> > > This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat
> directly
> > > 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking
> about
> > > the same problem...
> > > Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> > > B
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your
webapp
> is
> > > rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path.
> This
> > > is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> > > mod_webapp, though.
> > >
> > > --jeff
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
> > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > > there must be some sort of <filter> tag being enforced by tomcat 4.0
> > that
> > > > make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> > > > any hints?
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Carsten Lingemann
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> > > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > have you tried the following:
> > > >
> > > > <img border="0" src="<%= request.getContextPath()
> > > %>/images/butterfly.jpg">
> > > >
> > > > Carsten
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> > > > my jsp page has this image:
> > > > <img border="0" src="/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg">
> > > > The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The
> jsp
> > > page
> > > > WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!
> > > >
> > > > If I change it to:
> > > > <img border="0" src="http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";>  It
> > works
> > > > fine and fast!
> > > >
> > > > WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???
> > > >
> > > > my warp definition is:
> > > > everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
> > > > WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
> > > > WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
> > > > WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb
> > > >
> > > > Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle
the
> > > > images folder?
> > > >
> > > > B
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Troubles with the list:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Troubles with the list:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Troubles with the list:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to