The mod_webapp material found their might be fairly old.  I haven't looked in 
a while, so I can't say with any certainty.  I downloaded source for 
mod_webapp from the following page:

http://nagoya.apache.org/~pier/snapshots/

It has nightly packages complete with all that's needed to build mod_webapp.  
My build of it on Mandrake 8 has worked flawlessly.  I do recommend you build 
the warp.jar file and replace it in Tomcat at the same time you're replacing 
mod_webapp.so since there are some fixes in both files.

--David

On Friday 07 December 2001 01:08 am, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I just subscribed to this list yesterday only. I am trying to port and
> improve the mod_webapp on Linux /390. I successfully built it and ran it
> under windows 2000 and RedHat linux  without any changes from source drop,
> I downloaded from here
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0.1/src/
> but I find many problems with mod_webapp such as:
> 1. the requests are taking long to get served even a simple hello servlet
> takes 90+ seconds to display from localhost.
> 2. the error "socket closed: connection reset by peer" comes up often (
> every 3-4 request)
> Does any one else faced the same problems?
> Thanks and Regards,
> Sri K Ganjam
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:47 AM
> Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
>
> > clue please.  were is mod_webapp code?  no see cvs module
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:09 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> >
> > Sorry, but I forgot to mention that your other option would be to pull
> > the latest mod_webapp code from CVS and see if that helps. I just checked
> > the dev list and it looks like somebody is working on it -- though I
> > don't
>
> know
>
> > who...
> >
> > --jeff
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:35 PM
> > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> >
> > > I think that is what I would like to do after looking WAY TOO CLOSE at
> >
> > this.
> >
> > > Patrick I know your out there *peer* what do you say?  Let's move to
> >
> > mod_jk
> >
> > > *point*
> > > B
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:57 PM
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > >
> > > Personally, I would drop mod_webapp in favor of mod_jk, if you really
>
> need
>
> > > to run a separate web server. TC 4 was the first release of mod_webapp,
> > > while mod_jk has been around much longer -- and is better tested.
> > > AFAIK, there was only one guy working on mod_webapp and he announced he
> > > was
> >
> > taking
> >
> > > a long vacation a few weeks ago. I don't know if anybody has picked up
> >
> > where
> >
> > > he left off. TC 4.0.1 has a configuration line for mod_jk already
>
> included
>
> > > in server.xml.
> > >
> > > Looking through the list lately, a large percentage of the messages I
>
> see
>
> > > all relate to problems with mod_webapp.
> > >
> > > Your call...
> > >
> > > --jeff
> > >
> > > P.S. -- I've found TC 4 to be faster without the use of Apache. I use a
> > > small footprint webserver (i.e. Acme's thttpd or Dan Bernstein's
> >
> > publicfile)
> >
> > > to serve images from another port (81) and let TC handle all the
> > > dynamic stuff -- I don't have any non-dynamic html files on my site...
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:15 PM
> > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > >
> > > > I tried that and it does not work either.
> > > > I noticed that the examples that come with tomcat 4 does not show the
> > >
> > > images
> > >
> > > > also!
> > > > This is definitely a problem with WebAPP. I can connect to Tomcat
> >
> > directly
> >
> > > > 8080 and it works fine.  I've seen others on the list server asking
> >
> > about
> >
> > > > the same problem...
> > > > Who is in charge of WebApp developement?  Their List Serve?
> > > > B
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:36 PM
> > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > Subject: Re: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What about  just "/images/butterfly.jpg"? This assumes that your
>
> webapp
>
> > is
> >
> > > > rooted at /bbb -- so you don't need to use that as part of your path.
> >
> > This
> >
> > > > is what I normally use with mod_jk. Don't know if it will work with
> > > > mod_webapp, though.
> > > >
> > > > --jeff
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Brian Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:12 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > > >
> > > > > there must be some sort of <filter> tag being enforced by tomcat
> > > > > 4.0
> > >
> > > that
> > >
> > > > > make me define the images directory before I just start using it...
> > > > > any hints?
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Carsten Lingemann
>
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:31 PM
> > > > > To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> > > > > Subject: RE: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > have you tried the following:
> > > > >
> > > > > <img border="0" src="<%= request.getContextPath()
> > > >
> > > > %>/images/butterfly.jpg">
> > > >
> > > > > Carsten
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Brian Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:04 PM
> > > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > > Subject: ONE More Time! why does Tomcat 4 work this way
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I hace Apache with WebApp warping to tomcat
> > > > > my jsp page has this image:
> > > > > <img border="0" src="/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg">
> > > > > The web-app is named bbb and it has a directory called images.  The
> >
> > jsp
> >
> > > > page
> > > >
> > > > > WILL NOT SHOW THIS IMAGE!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > If I change it to:
> > > > > <img border="0" src="http://localhost/bbb/images/butterfly.jpg";> 
> > > > > It
> > >
> > > works
> > >
> > > > > fine and fast!
> > > > >
> > > > > WHAT THE F*&(* is up with my config or Tomcat???
> > > > >
> > > > > my warp definition is:
> > > > > everything that has a bbb after the url warps to Tomcat
> > > > > WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
> > > > > WebAppDeploy examples conn /examples
> > > > > WebAppDeploy bbb conn /bbb
> > > > >
> > > > > Am I missing something in my web.xml that should say how to handle
>
> the
>
> > > > > images folder?
> > > > >
> > > > > B
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe:
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > > > For additional commands:
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > > > Troubles with the list:
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe:
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > > > For additional commands:
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > > > Troubles with the list:
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe:
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > > > For additional commands:
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > > > Troubles with the list:
>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to