Jay, What happens if you try to access Apache content, such as with just http://host:8080/? Does Apache successfully serve content, or does these requests hang too?
Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:01 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, > but not sending requests > > > > Larry, > > Thanks for the info on the ajp12.id file. We may have > started tomcat > twice or something. We'll keep an eye out for that. > > The Tomcat log shows this at the end of the log after > initialization. > that looks good compared to other OSes that we have this running on. > > 2002-03-29 08:59:54 - Http10Interceptor: Starting on 8081 > 2002-03-29 08:59:54 - Ajp12Interceptor: Starting on 8007 > 2002-03-29 08:59:55 - Ajp13Interceptor: Starting on 8009 > > The test request we are trying is the tomcat Examples so > "http://host:8080/examples"; Where 8080 is the port apache is > on. All > that happens on the AIX box when we do this is the browser > hangs, waiting > for a response. > > On one of the Solaris boxes I turned the log level up to > "debug" on > mod_jk, and saw all alot more information from where the AIX > box mod_jk log > stopped. I also saw it checking all of the requests like you > said , it is > actually pretty cool. So here it what I think we are > missing in the AIX > mod_jk log that is showing up on the Solaris box. > > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (368)]: > Attempting to > map URI '/examples/' > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (391)]: > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a context match ajp13 -> > /examples/ > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_worker.c (123)]: Into > wc_get_worker_for_name ajp13 > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_worker.c (127)]: > wc_get_worker_for_name, done found a worker > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (865)]: Into > jk_worker_t::get_endpoint > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (775)]: Into > jk_endpoint_t::service > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13.c (403)]: Into > ajp13_marshal_into_msgb > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13.c (537)]: > ajp13_marshal_into_msgb - Done > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (206)]: sending to > ajp13 #190 > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (645)]: > send_request 2: > request body to send 0 - request body to resend 0 > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (258)]: > received from > ajp13 #28 > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13.c (584)]: > ajp13_unmarshal_response: status = 200 > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13.c (591)]: > ajp13_unmarshal_response: Number of headers is = 1 > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13.c (634)]: > ajp13_unmarshal_response: Header[0] [Content-Type] = [text/html] > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (258)]: > received from > ajp13 #1276 > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (258)]: > received from > ajp13 #2 > [Fri Mar 29 09:44:23 2002] [jk_ajp13_worker.c (549)]: Into > jk_endpoint_t::done > > So something on the AIX is not letting the mod_jk get to > these logs. On > AIX we never get the "sending to ajp13 #190" message or the > "received from > ajp13 #28". > > We are going to try some other stuff, as well as another > clean install and > see if that helps. Please let me know if you have any other idea? > > Thanks for all your help, > Jay > > > > > > > > Larry Isaacs > > > <Larry.Isaacs@ To: 'Tomcat > Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > sas.com> cc: > > > Subject: RE: > Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending > requests > 03/29/2002 > > > 09:34 AM > > > Please respond > > > to "Tomcat > > > Users List" > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ajp12.id file is used only for shutdown. It isn't used > at all by mod_jk. However, a "bug/feature" in tomcat.sh > would delete this file if Tomcat was started two time in > a row, making it necessary to specify the Ajp12 port in the > shutdown command. I'm not sure if this is what is occurring, > or the absence of ajp12.id is an indication that Tomcat did > not start successfully. > > Does the Tomcat log show that the Interceptors are starting > successfully on ports 8080,8007, and 8009? > > Also, what is the "test" request you are trying to execute > in your browser? What is the response you get? With > JkLogLevel set to debug, you should see evidence in mod_jk's > log of its inspection of every request that Apache receives. > I'm not sure why you would see any indication of the requests > Apache is receiving. > > Cheers, > Larry > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:09 AM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, > > but not sending requests > > > > > > > > Larry, > > > > Thanks for the response. > > > > I'm Seeing two different things. When the "ajp12.id" > file is not > > working correctly we get this in the log > > [jk_connect.c (108)]: Into jk_open_socket > > [jk_connect.c (115)]: jk_open_socket, try to > > connect socket = 6 > > [jk_connect.c (124)]: jk_open_socket, after > connect ret = -1 > > [jk_connect.c (143)]: jk_open_socket, connect() > > failed errno = 79 > > > > We think this is because ajp12.id file does not get > > created correctly > > or is deleted automatically. So mod_jk has issues with the > connection. > > > > When the ajp.id file is working correctly we see: > > > > [jk_worker.c (177)]: wc_create_worker, done > > [jk_worker.c (223)]: build_worker_map, removing > old ajp13 > > worker > > [jk_worker.c (235)]: build_worker_map, done > > [jk_worker.c (102)]: wc_open, done > > [jk_uri_worker_map.c (345)]: Into > > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker > > [jk_uri_worker_map.c (407)]: > > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a match ajp13 > > [jk_worker.c (123)]: Into wc_get_worker_for_name ajp13 > > [jk_worker.c (127)]: wc_get_worker_for_name, done > > found a worker > > [jk_ajp13_worker.c (654)]: Into jk_worker_t::get_endpoint > > [jk_ajp13_worker.c (539)]: Into jk_endpoint_t::service > > [jk_ajp13.c (346)]: Into ajp13_marshal_into_msgb > > [jk_ajp13.c (480)]: ajp13_marshal_into_msgb - Done > > [jk_connect.c (108)]: Into jk_open_socket > > [jk_connect.c (115)]: jk_open_socket, try to > > connect socket = 6 > > [jk_connect.c (124)]: jk_open_socket, after > connect ret = 0 > > [jk_connect.c (132)]: jk_open_socket, set > TCP_NODELAY to on > > [jk_connect.c (140)]: jk_open_socket, return, sd = 6 > > [jk_ajp13_worker.c (167)]: In > > jk_endpoint_t::connect_to_tomcat, > > connected sd = 6 > > > > > > This is the end of that log (set on debug). I do not > > actually see > > where is says it passes on to Tomcat, and tomcat never gets > > the request. > > We are not sure what is causing either of these problems. > Is there a > > particular user that tomcat or apache must be started as? > Do the file > > permission's/groups have something to so with it. We are > > starting as a > > special user but all of the files under Apache, and tomcat > > are awned by it. > > > > Thanks for any help, > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry Isaacs > > > > > > <Larry.Isaacs@ To: 'Tomcat > > Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > sas.com> cc: > > > > > > Subject: RE: > > Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but not sending > > requests > > 03/29/2002 > > > > > > 08:34 AM > > > > > > Please respond > > > > > > to "Tomcat > > > > > > Users List" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ajp13 should be the one to use. Does the mod_jk.log indicate > > that the request is or isn't being forwarded to Tomcat? > > > > Cheers, > > Larry > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jay Balunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:24 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Tomcat 3.3a and mod_jk on AIX 4.3.3 built OK, but > > > not sending requests > > > > > > > > > The mod_jk has been built successfully, and everything starts > > > but mod_jk > > > does not seem to be sending requests through. This exact same > > > configuration and mod_jk.conf files work on Solaris, and > HP, with no > > > problems. > > > > > > Pages served directly through Apache work fine, as well as > > > pages served > > > directly through tomcat. When we access a page that goes > > > through Apache > > > and then uses the mod_jk to route to Tomcat we have problems. > > > The requests > > > just never seem to make it to the servlets. even the Tomcat > > > examples do > > > not work. > > > > > > Logs do not really show anything even when turned up. Also > > > the ajp12.id > > > file seems to get deleted randomly, but this could be > > something else. > > > Should ajp13 work fine in AIX 4.3.3 or should we use ajp12. > > > > > > Any idea would be great and Thanks, > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe: > > <mailto:tomcat-user-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For > > additional commands: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Troubles with the list: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > > To > > unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Troubles with > the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe: > <mailto:tomcat-user-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > additional commands: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Troubles with the list: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > To > unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
