Duh, I mean Jerome! Apologies - busy day in work as usual :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Morgan Pyne > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 16:50 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: [Re-repost] tomcat/jk2/apache: authentication > not taken into account for webapps > > > Hi Jacob, > > (got your name right this time :-) > > Things to verify/try > > 1. The webserver has successfully authenticated the request, > and you can see this > username appearing in the Apache access log. You mention > that CGI's and other PHP pages > authenticate correctly, but verify that the URL of your > servlet is also > being correctly authenticated in this way. If you have > multiple location & directory > directives in Apache specifying access controls they can > often interact in > non-obvious ways. > > 2. You are using the latest jk2 module version. > > 3. If you are still hitting a brick wall with this, try using > mod_jk instead of jk2 as > a test and see if this makes a difference. > > Good luck! > Morgan > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jerome Lacoste @ BBC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 14:11 > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: [Re-repost] tomcat/jk2/apache: authentication not > > taken into account for webapps > > > > > > Still stuck... Need help on how to debug authentication. > > > > Morgan Pyne wrote: > > > > >Hi Jacob, > > > > > Hi Morgan, > > > > The name is Jerome :) Jacob was a guy who replied to me! > > > > >I should have mentioned in my earlier post that the > > >tomcatAuthentication="false" should only be part of the connector > > >definition of the server.xml if you are using the AJP13Connector. > > > > > >If you are using the Coyote Connector, it should be in the > > >jk2.properties files, e.g. request.tomcatAuthentication="false" > > > > > >However, it seems you are aware of this already. > > > > > I am using the Coyote Connector. The block for the AJP13Connector is > > commented out in the server.xml config file. > > jk2.properties contains > > > > request.tomcatAuthentication="false" > > > > > > (and that's the only uncommented line). > > > > >The simplest way to verify that the authentication information is > > >indeed being passed through from Tomcat to Apache is just to > > print the > > >value of request.getRemoteUser() in your servlet. > > > > > > > I've tried that and the retirved RemoteUser is always null. > > So I guess > > that this proves the authentication is not working. > > I've tried to add debugging and logging, but perhaps not to > the right > > places. > > > > I've done the following > > > > ** Added debugging to workers2.properties > > > > > cat /etc/httpd/conf/workers2.properties > > [logger] > > level=DEBUG > > file=${serverRoot}/logs/jk2.log > > # Define the communication channel > > [channel.socket:localhost:8009] info=Ajp13 forwarding over > > socket tomcatId=localhost:8009 debug=10 # Map /jkstatus to > > the status worker [shm] file=${serverRoot}/logs/shm.file > > size=1048576 debug=10 .... [uri:/examples/*] info=JSPs > > Servlets Examples debug=10 > > > > ** Added debugging to server.xml > > > > <Connector className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector" > > port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75" > > enableLookups="true" redirectPort="8443" > > acceptCount="10" debug="10" connectionTimeout="0" > > useURIValidationHack="false" > > > > protocolHandlerClassName="org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler" /> > > > > but still the information logged doesn't seem to satisfy my > debugging > > needs. I am not sure what to search for neither. > > > > >You previously stated that you are getting prompted for your > > >credentials when you browse to the page, so the Apache > side of things > > >appears to be working. > > > > > Yes. cgi scripts and other PHP pages correctly require > authentication. > > > > >It sounds like you have tried the various pieces necessary to get > > >this to work, but perhaps not all together at the same time :-) (?) > > > > > >Either that, or you are hitting a bug somewhere. > > > > > > > > I will not say I am 100 % sure I am doing the right thing, > > but after all > > I spent enough time on it that it makes me think that there > is a bug > > somewhere... > > Anybody can allocate some of his/her brain cells to try to > > solve this pb ? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jerome > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
