On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Rainer Orth
<ro at cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> James Carlson <carlsonj at workingcode.com> writes:
>
>>> To be honest, I myself did not yet read this TR, and that in particular is 
>>> due to the
>>> fact that we did not have any requests to support it till this very moment.
>>>
>>> Eventually we will, but we need to prioritize.
>>> And getting external interest for the feature helps putting proper 
>>> priorities.
>>
>> No doubt.  And to amplify the point: none of the organizations here are
>> operating as charities, so if there are paying customers asking through
>> the appropriate channels (their local sales and support folks) to have
>> work prioritized, that goes *much* further to getting work funded.
>>
>> Apart from that, there is another path.  Anyone who wants to can put
>> together the proposed new ABI, modify some open source compiler to
>> comply, and run the architectural bits through the ARC.  If the Sun
>> Studio team can contribute, that's great, but if that team's priorities
>> are elsewhere, I see nothing at all wrong with having the community
>> members with an interest in this driving the effort rather than just
>> "asking" for the work to be done.
>
> Agreed: my mail didn't intend to demand the work being done by the
> Studio and libc teams, but to determine if there was ongoing work in the
> area.  It would be foolish to start anything in this area without first
> making sure that nobody else went there before.
>
> That said, I doubt that I've got the spare time to define a decimal
> float on SPARC ABI myself and drive that through SPARC International for
> acceptance.  After all, both my GCC and OpenSolaris work are spare-time
> activities.  What I might try is use the established x86/amd64 ABI and
> try to get GCC to support decimal float on Solaris/x86 and see if I can
> adapt existing code with appropriate licenses (i.e. not GPL) for the
> necessary libc additions.

IBM's decnumber [http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/decnumber] has a
CDDL and CPL1.0 compatible license.

Irek

Reply via email to