> The real problem with driver versioning as it stands (and Steve's proposal)
 > is that when a driver is made up of multiple source files, modifying any
 > one of those ostensibly changes the driver.  But the "version" is kept in
 > only one of those files.  Thus the developer has to make a conscious
 > decision to apply an "empty delta" to the file with the version string in
 > order to bump it.  That's not always done -- either deliberately or not --
 > and makes the version string next to useless.
 > 
 > My preference would be to replace it with the build date and/or the
 > changeset hash of tip when the gate was built.  That's a lot of info to
 > shove into the modinfo line, so the question that gets raised in my mind
 > is, "what are the actual requirements from Sun's service folks and anyone
 > else who uses modinfo output to look for a version number?"

I strongly second these points.

-- 
meem
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to