Brian Gupta writes: > > If nothing else, it answers the inevitable first question: "so, why > > > aren't you just replacing 'vi' right now?" > > > > Good point. > > > I feel that the amount of deliberation, testing and certification required > to replace vi is sufficiant enough to be a seperate project. There is also a
I wasn't doubting you at all, nor that you were taking the right direction in avoiding replacing vi right now. I was just pointing out that when there's a wider (ARC) review of this document, it's likely that someone will ask this particular question, and that the web page you cited provides a quite handy quick answer. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
