>>>>> So what do y'all think should happen here? Should I push mercurial tip >>>>> into the WOS once every two weeks? Or hg-stable? Or just on request? >>>>> Or >>>>> leave the WOS alone and update the downloads page .... ? >>>> [...] >>>> What about having "stable" and "devel" versions. Devel could be updated >>>> daily or even more frequently, stable would be updated per request or bi >>>> weekly or as it is now. We could use stable the same way as it is now, >>>> and if the stable contains problem, we could try switching to devel. >>>> Personally packages are too in-flexible for me, I'm pulling my own hg >>>> automatically every day. Living on the edge seems to be quite safe with >>>> hg. >>> If all you depend on is hg (and possibly mq), that's probably fine. But >>> unfortunately we can't afford to be updating cdm constantly to match API >>> changes in hg... >> >> Oh, I see. Stupid question, what's cdm? If cdm depends on given version >> of mercurial, I would say that we could roll out new mercurial whenever >> cmd is ready. >> > > Cdm is the Mercurial extension we (and by we, I mean Rich ;)) are > developing for ON developers. It can probably be best described as a 'wx > replacement'.
Sounds interesting, do you have some link ?
Thanks
--
Vlad
pgpfpj6Cm78Rv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
