Petr Hruska wrote: > Just not sure this is fully in compliance with our usual ship criteria, > where we often requesting certain amount of P1,P2 are resolved for the > release if the priority of issues is done relatively to their amount not > the severity.
That's actually exactly correct -- ship criteria are not based directly on quality measurements, but on a massaged version of them. A bug could be extremely severe, but have such limited impact that we decide it's not worth holding the release back for, and we can guide the customers who will have this problem. On the flip side, a bug could be reasonably limited in the damage it can do, but be so annoying to a lot of customers that we decide it really needs to be fixed because it'll result in many customer calls. So these are really business decisions. > Also it's a bit strange to see in quality reports blocker with P4 > priority as well as P2s with minor severity .. Currently there is just > one P1 in the list of 26 stoppers. We don't have that many P1 bugs, period -- they're reserved for "drop everything, stop the build" bugs, and those tend to get cleared out pretty quickly. Danek _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
