That was exactly what I wanted to hear! Thank you very much, John. (Sorry for the false alarm, Alan)
Note: I assume that the elfsign in S10 FCS was good, and that the fix for 6214106 which caused the regression got pushed into a patch that ended up on the S10 machine that you use for signing. (I assume this since 6214106 says it was integrated into onnv-B8) --chris John E. Zolnowsky wrote: > The SW Release Engineering signing server is a Solaris 10 machine. > The fix for CR 6283570 misaligned ELF64 section heads was > integrated into Solaris Nevada, was backported to Solaris 10, > and a patch generated around the beginning of September. > In the meantime, CR 6301500 Multiple elfsign failures in SPARC & > X86 SUNWgcc package was discovered, fixed, backported, and > its patch (which include the fix for 6283570) is about to be > released. This patch will soon be applied to the signing server, > and the signing process will stop breaking new objects. > At that time I will scan all Solaris 10 objects for breakage, and > instigate patch revisions so any broken objects can be resigned with > the fixed signing server. > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > tools-linking mailing list > tools-linking at opensolaris.org
