If the api was only a thin wrapper around some base classes, then indeed you would not need fauxrequest. However the api does much processing itself and in practice using fauxrequest is much easier.
Bryan Op 6 feb 2011 02:29 schreef "Krinkle" <krinklem...@gmail.com>: Ilmari Karonen wrote: > On 02/06/2011 12:42 AM, Krinkle wrote: > >> So I was thinking : >> * upload... Yes indeed. FauxRequest is just one of the examples possible when having a internally working version of wmf-deployment on Toolserver. Ofcourse using any other classes is just as easy and is probably a better idea. -- Krinkle _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.w...
_______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
