Sounds great annd I agree with it.

I have only one issue: in spanish projects we don't have approved a global
bot rule (wikipedia, wikinews, wiki*). Is any problem with the plan if we
don't have this flag status?

Dennis Tobar
El 15/01/2012 13:39, "DaB." <w...@daniel.baur4.info> escribió:

> Hello,
> At Sunday 15 January 2012 17:13:26 DaB. wrote:
> > Isn't this a bit too many interwiki
> > bots?
>
> yes, there are, although not the cpu-load is the problem but the
> memory-usage.
> The best solution would be if the mediawiki-devs finaly get rid of
> interwiki-
> links in the article-text of course, but I have the fealing thta will not
> happen soon. The second best solution would be, if the interwiki.py would
> fix
> their code, but there I have also the fealing that will take some time.
>
> So here is my plan to fix the problem on our (the TS) side:
> 1.) I create a MMP called interwiki-bot (or something).
> 2.) YOU (the ts-users) choose (by election, by appointing, by playing
> "Trip to
> Jerusalem",  I don't care) 5 of you who will become member of that MMP
> until
> 15th February. Only rule: 1 of the 5 has to be an active user of a non-
> wikipedia-project (like wikisource or wiktionary or so).
> 3.) The members of the MMP create a wikimedia-project-account (like "ts-
> interwikibot" or something) and request global-bot-status until 1. April.
> 4.) After 2. April no-one is allowed to run a interwiki-bot except the MMP.
>
> Any problems with my plan?
>
> Sincerly,
> DaB.
>
> --
> Userpage: [[:w:de:User:DaB.]] — PGP: 2B255885
>
> _______________________________________________
> Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
> Posting guidelines for this list:
> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
>
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list: 
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette

Reply via email to