Waterfall the Anamorphic Development.
On Apr 19, 2013 4:14 AM, "Patricia Pintilie" <pintilieemp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ok so how about we recocnize what the overal goal is first . Then
> establish the point that its trying to convay. Only then can we meet in the
> middle and set a plan in motion. I can only assist when a plan of action is
> clear with a definite plan without it im lost on where to begin. It seems
> as if im doing my natural instinct research then I get mail from the people
> im reading about... Very interesting this is because im left to think my
> mind is linked to the problems at hand. TS is my old signature, my server
> os will pull up my IP searches. Which leads me to believe this is why I am
> always being brought up in the middle of these outstanding conversations
> you guys are having lol. Please send detailed instructions as to how I can
> help,there should be a file known as Mila.eu also known as ro.eula. Find it
> and run whatever it has, thanks.
> -patiently waiting your responce.
> -MilaStarX-TS
> On Apr 19, 2013 3:29 AM, "Platonides" <platoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19/04/13 01:19, DaB. wrote:
>> > as you may know there is a rev_text_id-field in the revision-table.
>> This field
>> > points to the text-table where the actual text is – or should be.
>> Because the
>> > WMF doesn’t store the text here, but only a pointer
>> ("DB://cluster25/11458305"
>> > for example). If you query different wikis you will see that most of
>> them point
>> > to the same cluster or one with a number short by. That says me (and I
>> was
>> > also told so before) that all text of all wmf-projects are stored
>> together.
>> > The task would now to separate wikidata from the rest – but the
>> storage-area
>> > has no clue from where a text is which makes the separating very hard.
>> And
>> > there is another problem: Deleted texts are also in this area, so even
>> more
>> > filtering would be needed.
>> > I very doubt that this situation will change at the TS and I also doubt
>> that
>> > it will be different for WikiLabs. So I guess your best bet is the API
>> here.
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> > DaB.
>>
>> I think the only hope would be if wikidata was stored under its own
>> cluster (for easier differenciation) and at least one server of that
>> group (the master?) only had that (so toolserver could get its binlogs).
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
>> Posting guidelines for this list:
>> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
>
>
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
