On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Maarten Dammers <maar...@mdammers.nl>wrote:
> Hi DrTrigon, > > Op 10-8-2013 11:36, Dr. Trigon schreef: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello DaB! >> >> Could you please give me a short update - the end of 2013 is >> approaching, what is the current state for TS resp. Labs? >> > If you don't care about losing your (nfs) file system every once in a > while and having very slow databases, you can probably start moving stuff > to toollabs. > I'm waiting for these bugs to be fixed. It's been more than 3 months now > and no clear estimate when it will be fixed. > > I don't think that's a fair representation. Despite some teething problems, Labs has been at least (probably more) reliable than the toolserver in the time I've been there. I have ported 25 tools to Labs now, including some heavy-duty ones, and they all seem to work fine. Yes, there is the occasional bug (imagelinks table on cawiki is not working at the moment; roots are en route from Wikimania;-) but I don't see the traditional toolserver slowness, and Labs doesn't occasionally vanish behind 504 errors for hours at a time either.
_______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
