Don't we have to state the license for all our code to get a password renewal? I remember setting that at some point...
In any case, having a list of most accessed tools would be a start. At the very least we could determine if the licensing is a major issue. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Marc A. Pelletier <m...@uberbox.org> wrote: > On 10/07/2013 06:27 PM, Magnus Manske wrote: > > * Forcibly port the most important, unmaintained tools to Labs > > Sadly, that's only possible when the code is unambiguously licensed as > Open Source, which is often not the case (much of the code running on > the Toolserver has no licensing information at all). > > -- Marc > > > _______________________________________________ > Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l > Posting guidelines for this list: > https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette > -- undefined
_______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
