Just curious, not knowing anymore than I do about RHR....how do they verify that a paid user even holds a ticket. It would also be alarming to find that RHR sites are being used to stage DQRM attacks during DXpeditions.
I guess crazier things have been dreamt up.... Cecil Sent using recycled electrons. > On Feb 4, 2015, at 6:44 PM, "JC" <n...@comcast.net> wrote: > > "" RHR requires a log in name, password, and they watch IPs. After some > early abuse, they started checking to be sure the name and password come > from the same IP or IP pool as the user name and password combo. When it is > a foreign user, of which there are a limited number, the traffic is > watched." > > Hi Tom > > Yes. Everything is so clear and controlled by RHR that no one will use the > remote station to work a new DXCC because they/he/she must use /p or /W4 , > That use of /remote call sign makes the QSO invalid for DXCC. > > So, why not published the call sign of all RHR users and send it to DXCC > desk! > > Let's make this clear and transparent. > > DXCC can create a new category for RHR DXCC users? > > Is this IT9 is a RHR customer? > > Regards > JC > N4IS > > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband