Bob, I ran the same thing for years here in AZ with great results. 4 elevated radials at 12 feet, Each was 132 feet long. Worked 237 countries. Hardy N7RT
-----Original Message----- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Robert Harmon Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 4:59 PM To: Mike Waters Cc: topband Subject: Re: Topband: QRP Mike, Thats good stuff ! I am putting up a 160 with 4 elevated radials at 14 feet (would like to get them higher but they are the least visible at 14 feet to my wife :-) I am anxious to see how it works. thanks for the reference info! Bob K6UJ On 12/15/15 3:50 PM, Mike Waters wrote: > According to this they are close. > > lists.contesting.com/_topband/2007-11/msg00248.html > <http://lists.contesting.com/_topband/2007-11/msg00248.html> > > www.antennasbyn6lf.com/design_of_radial_ground_systems > <http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/design_of_radial_ground_systems> - > scroll down to the section "QEX article on elevated radial ground > systems" and study the material in the links. > > I was amazed at how well just two elevated radials work here, though I > plan on four someday. > www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html#inv-l_antenna > <http://www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html#inv-l_antenna> > > 73, Mike > www.w0btu.com <http://www.w0btu.com> > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Robert Harmon <k...@pacbell.net > <mailto:k...@pacbell.net>> wrote: > > Do the 160 verticals with 4 radials elevated at 20 feet, > individually outperform the other vertical with 60 radials on the > ground ? > > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband