Hi Oleksandr,

I can confirm there is a problem and we are investigating why the output is the same. I will keep you posted.

Holger



On 7/03/2017 20:48, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
Hi Holger,
thank you very much for your advice!

I've created new SPARQLMotion script with such modules: spl:Argument -> sml:ApplyConstruct -> sml:ReturnRDF, where in sml:ApplyConstruct I put this constructQuery:
|
CONSTRUCT {
?a ?b ?c .
}
WHERE {
    BIND (smf:buildURI("{?1}",?projectGraph)AS ?graphName).
    GRAPH ?graphName {
?a ?b ?c .
}.
}
|

and sml:RDFXMLAbbrev in sml:ReturnRDF

but it produces the same output with sml:RDFXML.

Also I tried to change arg:serialization in teamwork:ExportEntireProjectPlugin for ExportToRDF, but it also produces the same output as with sml:RDFXML.

I'm working on EVN Version 5.2.0.v20160909-1520B.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Oleksandr Mandryk

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:27 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch wrote:

    Try to use sml:serialization=sml:RDFXMLAbbrev at sml:ReturnRDF.


    In general, the main alternatives for producing arbitrary XML are
    Semantic XML (via sml:ConvertRDFToXML) or SWP. SWP can produce any
    XML, assuming you turn each XML element into a subclass of
    ui:Element and each XML attribute into corresponding argument
    properties at these elements.

    Holger


    On 7/03/2017 13:26, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
    Hi Hogler,

    as far as I remember the nested resources was the main issue. I
    haven't tried approach that you suggested but as I can see
    here
    http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF
    <http://www.topquadrant.com/sparqlmotion/lib.html#sml:ReturnRDF>
    there is no such property in sml:ReturnRDF.

    Could you please explain where I can specify sml:RDFXML /
    sml:RDFXMLAbbrev?

    BTW: Do we have any alternatives (just in case) to this approach?
    I mean if I would like to build totally different XML from
    taxonomy RDF what would be the most appropriate way to do it?

    Thank you very much!

    Best regards,
    Oleksandr Mandryk


    On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:07:44 AM UTC+1, Holger Knublauch
    wrote:

        Whether resources are nested or remain top-level is a
        configuration option in the RDF/XML writer. In sml:ReturnRDF,
        try using sml:RDFXML versus sml:RDFXMLAbbrev (the abbrev
        option will produce nested objects). Have you tried this or
        would there be other differences from your planned output?

        Holger

        On 7/03/2017 12:56, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
        Hi Hogler,
        thank you for reply!

        Actually RDF/XML is pretty different from what I need. The
        biggest issue with RDF/XML for me is hierarchical structure
        of relations between nodes,
        for example if PARENT_NODE is parent of CHILD_NODE in
        RDF/XML it will look like this:

        |
        <CHILD_NODE>

         ... properties

        <broader>
        <PARENT_NODE>
         ...
        <PARENT_NODE>
        </broader>


        </CHILD_NODE>
        |


        but I need something like this:

        |
        <CHILD_NODE>
         ... properties


        <broaderid="PARENT_NODE">
        </CHILD_NODE>


        <PARENT_NODE>
         ... properties
        <narrowerid="CHILD_NODE">
        <PARENT_NODE>
        |

        so each node should be separate XML element.
        Thanks.

        Best regards,
        Oleksandr Mandryk

        On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 11:13:00 PM UTC+1, Holger
        Knublauch wrote:



            On 7/03/2017 0:40, Oleksandr Mandryk wrote:
            Hi,

            I'm trying to create a SPARQLMotion script that will
            export specified taxonomy to the custom XML output.

            Currently my script is based no these modules:
            *
            *
            *spl:Argument* -> *sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace* ->
            *sml:ConvertRDFToXML* -> *sml:ReturnXML*


            But when I run this script I get only the first (root)
            node of the specified projectGraph:

            |
            
<skos:Conceptxmlns:composite="http://www.topbraid.org/2007/05/composite.owl";
            
<http://www.topbraid.org/2007/05/composite.owl>xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core";
            <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core>skos:prefLabel=RootTestNode"/>
            |

            So I have a few questions:

            1) Is my approach correct? I mean spl:Argument ->
            sml:ImportRDFFromWorkspace -> sml:ConvertRDFToXML ->
            sml:ReturnXML

            2) Why I'm receiving only first node as result but not all?

            3) How to specify a custom template for the XML, for
            example I need something like this:
            |
            <rdf:RDF
                xmlns:ui="http://uispin.org/ui#";
            <http://uispin.org/ui#>
                xmlns:let="http://uispin.org/let#";
            <http://uispin.org/let#>
             ... >

            
<rdf:Descriptionrdf:about="http://test.com/Concept_7c932ea3-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a";
            <http://test.com/Concept_7c932ea3-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a>>
            <rdfs:labelrdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string";
            <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>>NodeLabel</rdfs:label>
            <rdf:typerdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept";
            <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept>/>

            
<skos:broaderrdf:resource="http://test.com/#Concept_7c932e90-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a";
            <http://test.com/#Concept_7c932e90-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a>/>

            
<skos:narrowerrdf:resource="http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea8-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a";
            <http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea8-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a>/>
            
<skos:narrowerrdf:resource="http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea5-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a";
            <http://test.com/#Concept_7c932ea5-2b5b-11b2-8037-eac2f42a0c5a>/>


              ... other properties

            </rdf:Description>

            ...

            </rdf:RDF>

            |


            This output looks very much like RDF/XML. How does it
            differ, and could you simply use sml:ReturnRDF?

            Holger



            Thank you very much!

            Best regards,
            Oleksandr Mandryk

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of
            which include the TopBraid Suite family of products and
            its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web
            Pages and SPIN.
            To post to this group, send email to
            topbrai...@googlegroups.com
            ---
            You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
            emails from it, send an email to
            topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
            For more options, visit
            https://groups.google.com/d/optout
            <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which
        include the TopBraid Suite family of products and its base
        technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
        To post to this group, send email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com
        ---
        You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
        from it, send an email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
        <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include
    the TopBraid Suite family of products and its base technologies
    such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
    To post to this group, send email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com
    <javascript:>
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
    <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family of products and its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid 
Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family of products and 
its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to