> On 21 Apr 2020, at 12:41, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
> <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> What I meant was: domain and range are independent so if I have only a range, 
> I HAVE to make it an explicit Propertyshape (with as I think: a 
> allSubjectsFrom...).
> But if I have a domain AND a range, I can do the range via 
> sh:property/sh:class/sh:datatype in the NodeShape (as we did now).
>  
>  
> My issue is: the range restriction does not only hold in the domain case: it 
> always holds..its independent of that domain.

I’m not sure why this is an issue. A named PS can use sh:class or sh:datatype 
to specify the required “range" with no mention of “domain”. I’m not sure I 
agree - see below.

> So...shouldnt a range always be modelled separately from the domain 
> nodeshape, in general as a property shape.

Not necessarily. Some PropertyShapes (i.e. properties) only make sense in the 
context of a specific NodeShape (i.e. Class). The US has Social Security Number 
with a required NNN-NN-NNNN pattern and only instances of class USPerson (i.e. 
U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and temporary (working) residents) can have 
that - class Dog cannot, so not necessary to model it outside the context of 
Person. In fact, you might argue that making it a separate named PS with just a 
sh:path and sh:datatype creates the potential for misuse by other modellers 
using your shapes, and therefore choose not to do so.

> (subissue being then whether sh:allSubjectsOf is needed or not, see  reply 
> Jan; I am still unsure there: you have to give a path and that path should 
> start at some target or is there some kind of default in play here?)

In your simple case, all that's required in SHACL is that PS sh:path should be 
the IRI of the predicate (plus the sh:class or sh:datatype). You can then say 
more in the NodeShapes that control where the PS is used.

Cheers,
David

>  
>  
>  
>  
> Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
> Senior Data Scientist
> 
> T +31888663107
> M +31630381220
> E michel.bo...@tno.nl <mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>    
> Location 
> <https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>
> 
>  
> <image001.gif> <http://www.tno.nl/>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
> not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
> requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no 
> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it 
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the 
> electronic transmission of messages.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> 
> <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> 
> Namens dprice
> Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 1:17 PM
> Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
>  
> Technically, x:Vehicle-loadLevel is independent which may not be exactly what 
> you want. Since you had a domain on the property, you’ve said it is not 
> independent of subject - so I used the PS name to make the intent clear. 
>  
> I personally prefer the sh:property style of modelling because I can look at 
> the NodeShape and it’s superclasses to find every property shape that comes 
> into play. That does mean when focusing on the PS I have to do a search to 
> “Find references” for the NS (but by using the PS naming convention of 
> Class-Property I don’t actually need to do that to know where the PS is used).
>  
> Cheers,
> David
>  
>  
> On 21 Apr 2020, at 12:04, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
> <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> 
> wrote:
>  
>  
> Hmmm...I thought that you would use sh:targetSubjectsOf if you want to 
> constrain independent from the type of subject!
> (so just any subject having the property)
>  
> (In david example the target was ex:Vehicle, so he used the property shape in 
> the context of a sh:NodeShape)
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
> Senior Data Scientist
> 
> 
> T +31888663107
> M +31630381220
> E michel.bo...@tno.nl <mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>    
> Location 
> <https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>
> 
>  
> <image001.gif> <http://www.tno.nl/>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
> not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
> requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no 
> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it 
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the 
> electronic transmission of messages.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> 
> <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> 
> Namens Jan Voskuil
> Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:58 PM
> Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Onderwerp: RE: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
>  
> The shape is a property shape. Wherever the property in the property path 
> occurs (i.e. ex:loadLevel), the constraint will be checked/validated. So, no 
> need to specify sh:targetSubjectsOf --- unless you want the constraint to 
> hold only if a specific type of subject is present. -j
>  
> From: 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
> <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> 
> Sent: 21 April 2020 12:45
> To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
>  
>  
> I’ll add the labels indeed!
>  
> Wrt shacl: what is the target of this shape?
>  
> No need to add sh:targetSubjectsOf ex:loadLevel ?
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
> Senior Data Scientist
> 
> T +31888663107
> M +31630381220
> E michel.bo...@tno.nl <mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>    
> Location 
> <https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>
> 
>  
> <image001.gif> <http://www.tno.nl/>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
> not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
> requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no 
> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it 
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the 
> electronic transmission of messages.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> 
> <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> 
> Namens dprice
> Verzonden: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 11:56 AM
> Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ?
>  
> Not sure about “best” but I did this and it works great and aligns with your 
> model:
>  
> 1) Added to ensure drop-down lists show the right instances for selection in 
> a UI
>  
> ex:Heavy
>   a ex:LoadLevelType ;
>   rdfs:label "Heavy" ;
> .
> ex:Light
>   a ex:LoadLevelType ;
>   rdfs:label "Light" ;
> .
> ex:Normal
>   a ex:LoadLevelType ;
>   rdfs:label "Normal" ;
> .
>  
> 2) sh:in in the PropertyShape gives me a violation if I go in and make an 
> instance with anything other than the 3 selections
>  
> ex:Vehicle-loadLevel
>   a sh:PropertyShape ;
>   sh:path ex:loadLevel ;
>   sh:class ex:LoadLevelType ;
>   sh:in (
>       ex:Light
>       ex:Normal
>       ex:Heavy
>     ) ;
> .
>  
> Cheers,
> David
>  
> 
> On 21 Apr 2020, at 10:07, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
> <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> 
> wrote:
>  
> If I want to move:
>  
> ex:loadLevel
>   a rdf:Property ;
>   rdfs:domain ex:Vehicle ;
>   rdfs:range ex:LoadLevelType ;
> .
>  
> ex:LoadLevelType
>   a rdfs:Class ;
>   rdfs:subClassOf smls:EnumerationType ;
>   owl:oneOf (
>       ex:Light
>       ex:Normal
>       ex:Heavy
>     ) ;
> .
>  
> To SHACL; what is the best way to handle the owl:oneOf?
>  
> 1.  in a property shape for loadLevel involving sh:targetSubjectsOf with sh:in
>  
> 2. in the nodeshape for vehicle with sh:in on with path ex:loadLevel
>  
> For rdfs ranges I use 2. in case there is also a domain and 1. In case there 
> is no domain, but here the constraint is more generic on the range class.
>  
> Thx Michel
>  
> Ps
> Related:
> In general wouldn’t it be more precise to always map a range to a property 
> shape (involving targetSubjectsOf) so also in case there is a domain 
> clause...since domain and range are fully independent....
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
> Senior Data Scientist
> 
> T +31888663107
> M +31630381220
> E michel.bo...@tno.nl <mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>    
> Location 
> <https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>
> 
>  
> <image001.gif> <http://www.tno.nl/>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
> not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
> requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no 
> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it 
> and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the 
> electronic transmission of messages.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/33cb2621c13641ffbf7e027bf9111354%40tno.nl
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/33cb2621c13641ffbf7e027bf9111354%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>  
> UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
> US +1 (336) 283-0808
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/DD08E718-3A78-4210-B9B1-3C48353AC734%40topquadrant.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/DD08E718-3A78-4210-B9B1-3C48353AC734%40topquadrant.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/8409ddee1bd54e5db478c913152392d0%40tno.nl
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/8409ddee1bd54e5db478c913152392d0%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/AM0PR03MB3745ABBEA5DFDB887ED0D226E9D50%40AM0PR03MB3745.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/AM0PR03MB3745ABBEA5DFDB887ED0D226E9D50%40AM0PR03MB3745.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/571a1193e9374cf6bda93cc5e0479f46%40tno.nl
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/571a1193e9374cf6bda93cc5e0479f46%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>  
> UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
> US +1 (336) 283-0808
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/65FE3370-2B73-451A-A9B7-2E4599BEDE49%40topquadrant.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/65FE3370-2B73-451A-A9B7-2E4599BEDE49%40topquadrant.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/0e0b3e2c50ba42ad9c754c2fd8d04c28%40tno.nl
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/0e0b3e2c50ba42ad9c754c2fd8d04c28%40tno.nl?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
US +1 (336) 283-0808‬

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/81B156B6-9026-421F-B337-32C0DB51AB01%40topquadrant.com.

Reply via email to