Agreed, although “logically better” would in my view always prevail over “performance better”. Of course logic can be compromised for performance reasons but then that should be made as explicit as possible. (beyond that I think David also argued that performance was here not such a big issue in EDG)
gr Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E michel.bo...@tno.nl<mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl> Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707> [cid:image001.gif@01D618B8.BB4EC8C0]<http://www.tno.nl/> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> Namens Irene Polikoff Verzonden: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:06 PM Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] owl:oneOf to shacl ? You asked “what is better”. To me, answering this question requires considering the context of use from which come criteria for what it means to be better. If you are making some statements that will simply be read by other people, then the most important criteria for ‘better’ is how easily other people can understand these statements. If you are making statements that are intended to be machine processable, then I do not see how “better” can’t be decided on without considering performance implications. On Apr 22, 2020, at 3:23 AM, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: - wrt range in case of also domain: I did not argue based on performance just on logic: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/83B7FCFA-A606-4989-BF4B-531E9A19D061%40topquadrant.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/83B7FCFA-A606-4989-BF4B-531E9A19D061%40topquadrant.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/02d38e399b9148098be718e2c08d6f52%40tno.nl.
