Dear All, We use the pattern:
sml-term:Activity a skos:Concept ; skos:broader sml-term:Entity ; skos:definition "An activity is something possibly or actually happening in space and time"@en ; skos:prefLabel "Activity"@en ; . sml:Activity a rdfs:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy sml-term:Activity ; rdfs:subClassOf sml:Entity ; . But this means that the label is only indirectly available for sml:Activity (via "isDefinedBy.prefLabel") Is this an issue? (many tools like to have a direct label for their classes) Better solutions? (I'd like to define only once, not double; label feels naturally close to definition; maybe only prefLabel to rdfs-variant and leave altLabel/definition at skos?) Thx for advice, Michel Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms Scientist Specialist Structural Reliability T +31 (0)88 866 31 07 M +31 (0)63 038 12 20 E michel.bo...@tno.nl<mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl> Location<http://www.tno.nl/locations/DTS> [cid:image001.gif@01D76CCB.A2FB2D50]<http://www.tno.nl/> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/65077d500edc4a6bb4f8289d08326df2%40tno.nl.
